DIY Wills - A Disaster Waiting To Happen?

Wake Smith Solicitors 12 June 2011

Rachel Baseley, associate in the Private Client team, highlights the pitfalls of putting together a will without seeking legal advice  A friend of mine said to me the other day, "I don't know what you solicitors do all day! I've made three wills in my time and I wrote all of them myself, very easily. Why would I pay a solicitor to do something I can do myself?" Why indeed? I wasn't too offended by my friend's comments - after all, it's the sort of thing we solicitors are used to hearing. However, I did wonder whether the wills he had written were really as cost-effective as he thought they were.   Writing a will is one of those jobs where, unless you know exactly what you are doing, it's just too easy to end up with a very different result from the one intended. As recent case illustrates the point perfectly. Webb v Oldfield [2010] EWHC 3469 (Ch) concerned the homemade will of a lady called Pamela Webb. Mrs Webb had three children called Bernard, Harvey and Barbara and in 1995 she decided to make a will setting out how her estate was to be divided between them. Mrs Webb didn't bother consulting a solicitor - perhaps, just like my friend, she thought it was unnecessary as she knew what she was doing. Instead, she purchased a pre-printed will form from a newsagents and filled it in herself. Mrs Webb started her will, quite correctly, by appointing two executors to administer her affairs after her death. The problems started after this because she then went on to say: "2. I give to those below the legacies below. I want Harvey Webb's money protected by the discretion of my executors in view of addiction½I leave Andy Procupieck £200." Immediately after that she wrote: "3. The residue of my estate I give absolutely to Bernard Webb, Harvey Webb and Barbara Oldfield in equal shares ½" When Mrs Webb died in 2003, her daughter Barbara instructed a firm of solicitors to administer the estate which was worth about £275,000. The solicitors distributed a third of the estate to Bernard and a third to Barbara herself, in accordance with the terms of the will. But what should they do with Harvey's share? Should they give it direct to Harvey, as suggested by clause 3 of the will or should they follow the instructions in clause 2 and keep the money "protected" in some way? Of course, the only person who could really answer this question was Mrs Webb herself and she was dead so Barbara was left in a quandary over how to deal with Harvey's share of the estate. By 2010, Harvey had decided to take his mother's estate to court in order to settle the matter. Harvey claimed that the crucial part of the will was clause 3 and that he was entitled to take his one third share of the estate outright. Barbara, in her role as executor, defended the claim and argued that clause 2 of the will imposed a trust over Harvey's third share so that he was not entitled to receive it outright. The judge decided that the only evidence he could consider was that contained within the body of the will itself. He discounted evidence which showed that Mrs Webster's father's professionally drawn will had contained a number of trusts and declined to infer that Mrs Webb had perhaps wanted to achieve something similar in her own homemade will. Instead, the judge emphasised that clause 3 of the will created a clear outright division of the estate into three shares, one for each of the children. He held that the words contained in clause 2 were not sufficiently clear to create a trust or any other sort of protective arrangement. As a result, he ordered that the remaining third of the estate be paid immediately to Harvey. I wonder what Mrs Webb would have said, had she known what the outcome would be? Her seemingly simple DIY will had resulted in a court case between two of her children. Despite her clearly stated wishes, Harvey's inheritance was handed over to him rather than "protected" by the executors. The case was not decided until seven years after her death - seven years during which her children presumably instructed solicitors and barristers in order to argue their different points of view. I don't know what the legal costs of the case were, but I would hazard a guess that, after seven years of dispute, they were many hundreds of times greater than the fee Mrs Webb would have incurred had she instructed a solicitor to prepare her will properly in the first place! Had Mrs Webb come to see me about her will, I would have told her that it was actually perfectly possible to place Harvey's inheritance in trust so as to protect him from himself, if she felt that was necessary. The will would have contained the appropriate wording to create a valid and binding trust and its terms would have been adhered to after Mrs Webb's death. In short, a great deal of heartache could easily have been avoided had Mrs Webb taken proper advice about her will rather than attempting to do it herself. For more information about making or amending a will, please contact Rachel Baseley on 0114 266 6660 or email [email protected]

Tags

Archive

March 20247February 20242January 20248December 20236November 20232October 20235September 20232August 20234July 20232June 20235May 20238March 20234February 20235January 20233December 20225November 20224October 20224September 20223August 20221June 20221May 20227April 20223March 20223February 20223January 20224December 20214November 20213October 20215September 20216August 20212July 202111June 20218May 20216April 20212March 20218February 20218January 20219December 20208November 202013October 20209September 20208August 20203July 20208June 202016May 202013April 20209March 202016February 20209January 202011December 20199November 20199October 201911September 20195August 20194July 20196May 20198April 20196March 20193February 20195January 20194December 20186November 20185October 20182September 20185August 20184July 20189June 20184May 201810April 20185March 20184February 20184January 20183December 20175November 20178October 20177September 20179August 20175July 20176June 201710May 20176April 20178March 201711February 20176January 201712December 20169November 20167October 201610September 201610August 20166July 20167June 20163May 20162April 20166March 20162February 20164January 20165December 20153November 20155October 20156September 20156August 20157July 20157June 20157May 20156April 20159March 20156February 201510January 20156December 20145November 20144October 20142September 20143May 20144March 20146February 20144January 20142December 20132November 20133September 20134July 20132June 20132May 20133April 20131March 20133February 20133January 20136December 20121November 20123October 20122August 20122July 20128June 20123April 20123March 20121January 20124December 20112November 20111October 20112September 20113August 20113July 20117June 20119May 20117April 20115March 20119February 20118January 20111December 20101October 20102September 20102August 20103July 20106June 20101May 20102April 20106March 20102February 20103January 20102December 20095November 20092October 20092September 20092August 20091July 20095June 20095May 20093April 20093March 20093February 20091January 20092November 20082October 20082September 20081August 20083July 20081January 20082

Featured Articles

Contact us