Is your company paying the correct amount of holiday pay?

Wake Smith Solicitors 07 June 2018

The holiday season is shortly upon us.

All employers will have contracts of employment which agree terms of payment for staff – and this will include pay to cover holiday allowances.

What many employers may not be aware of is the shifting legal focus on this issue which means that they are likely to be scrutinised in tribunals if challenged on the correct value of these holiday pay allowances.

This is particularly pertinent with regards to employees whose salaries are partly made up from commission earnings or overtime.

Employment lawyer Mark Serby from Wake Smith takes a break to consider the issue.

“Historically, most businesses have paid a basic salary allowance for holidays, which does not include any commission or overtime percentage equivalent.

This has been successfully challenged in several high profile cases which have gone in favour of the employee Claimants. The outcome of these cases has a significant impact upon holiday pay for many employers.

“The question this poses to employers is whether they are doing enough to match normal earnings for any employee during holiday leave, where that employee relies at any time on additional income, from such sources as overtime, bonuses or commission, to raise their salary up to a level that they are accustomed to earning.

“In the case of Williams and others v British Airways plc  the European Court of Justice found that a pilot’s holiday pay should not be limited to basic salary but must correspond to normal remuneration which means that holiday pay should include remuneration linked to the performance of tasks they were contractually bound to perform and payments that related to their professional status. Ancilliary costs such as expenses were not taken into account in calculating holiday pay because obviously they were not being incurred.

“These principles were built on in Bear Scotland v. Fulton. In 2015 the Employment Appeal Tribunal considered the question of overtime payments and criticised employers who were paying basic pay during holiday periods without considering how overtime payments should also fall into that calculation. This set an initial precedent which has been brought much more into the spotlight when considered alongside other cases regarding holiday pay.

“In the case of Lock v. British Gas Mr Lock was employed as a salesman by British Gas and was paid a basic salary plus commission based on the number and type of contracts he tied customers into.

“However, when Mr Lock took holiday leave, he was only paid his basic salary plus any commission which he had earned prior to the holiday period. Since he was on holiday, he could not earn any commission, his earnings were reduced below his usual value - and it was that disparity which formed the basis of the dispute.

“It had already been decided in the employment tribunal that Mr Lock was entitled to back-pay from British Gas for the failure to pay an amount equivalent to commission which he would otherwise have earned, if he had not been on holiday.

“The whole point of the dispute's focus is that employees should not be penalised by receiving only normal pay and should in fact, be encouraged to take statutory minimum holiday.

“It is vital that employers take note of the importance of these cases and review their own policies on holiday pay in relation to overtime and commission earnings as this is likely to be challenged much more openly as cases such as Bear Scotland v. Fulton and Lock v. British Gas have become precedents for such disputes.

For further information please contact Mark Serby on 0114 224 2048 or at [email protected]

Tags

Archive

March 20247February 20242January 20248December 20236November 20232October 20235September 20232August 20234July 20232June 20235May 20238March 20234February 20235January 20233December 20225November 20224October 20224September 20223August 20221June 20221May 20227April 20223March 20223February 20223January 20224December 20214November 20213October 20215September 20216August 20212July 202111June 20218May 20216April 20212March 20218February 20218January 20219December 20208November 202013October 20209September 20208August 20203July 20208June 202016May 202013April 20209March 202016February 20209January 202011December 20199November 20199October 201911September 20195August 20194July 20196May 20198April 20196March 20193February 20195January 20194December 20186November 20185October 20182September 20185August 20184July 20189June 20184May 201810April 20185March 20184February 20184January 20183December 20175November 20178October 20177September 20179August 20175July 20176June 201710May 20176April 20178March 201711February 20176January 201712December 20169November 20167October 201610September 201610August 20166July 20167June 20163May 20162April 20166March 20162February 20164January 20165December 20153November 20155October 20156September 20156August 20157July 20157June 20157May 20156April 20159March 20156February 201510January 20156December 20145November 20144October 20142September 20143May 20144March 20146February 20144January 20142December 20132November 20133September 20134July 20132June 20132May 20133April 20131March 20133February 20133January 20136December 20121November 20123October 20122August 20122July 20128June 20123April 20123March 20121January 20124December 20112November 20111October 20112September 20113August 20113July 20117June 20119May 20117April 20115March 20119February 20118January 20111December 20101October 20102September 20102August 20103July 20106June 20101May 20102April 20106March 20102February 20103January 20102December 20095November 20092October 20092September 20092August 20091July 20095June 20095May 20093April 20093March 20093February 20091January 20092November 20082October 20082September 20081August 20083July 20081January 20082

Featured Articles

Contact us