Changes to inheritance tax rules

Wake Smith Solicitors 08 January 2008

You may have seen the media coverage of Alistair Darling's Pre Budget Report on 9 October 2007. The measure that grabbed the headlines was his introduction of a 'transferable nil rate band' for inheritance tax purposes.

Over the last few years, more people have found themselves dragged into the inheritance tax net because they own assets worth more than the 'nil rate band' (presently £300,000). When someone dies, if there is more than £300,000 in the estate, the surplus is generally taxed at 40%. Previously this caused a particular problem for married couples and civil partners, because when the first person died they could transfer assets to each other tax free due to the 'spouse exemption'. This meant that all of the couple's assets ended up 'bunched up' in the estate of the survivor. So, when the second person died and left the couple's combined estate to their children or other beneficiaries, only the second person's nil rate band was available to reduce the inheritance tax bill.

The changes announced in the Pre Budget Report mean that from now on, the surviving spouse or civil partner's executors will be able to make a claim to the Revenue for any unused nil rate band allowance on the first death to be transferred to the second estate, thereby increasing the tax free amount available on the second death. Better still, the unused proportion of the nil rate band that is carried forward is then applied to the nil rate band allowance in force as at the date of the second death. If the second spouse dies many years after the first, this could greatly increase the amount of the second estate which passes tax free - see the sample calculation below:

Example:

Pat dies on 26 September 2007, leaving an estate worth £400,000 in total. She leaves legacies of £15,000 to each of her children, Tom and Helen, and the residue of her estate to her husband, Tony. The nil rate band amount when Pat dies is £300,000 and gifts to spouses are exempt from inheritance tax, so there is no inheritance tax due on Pat's death.

Tony dies on 22 June 2009, leaving an estate worth 550,000. His will leaves everything to Tom and Helen in equal shares. By then the nil rate band is £325,000. Tony's executors make a claim to the Revenue to transfer the unused proportion of Pat's nil rate band to Tony's estate. Because Pat only used 30,000/300,000 or 10% of her nil rate band, the remaining 90% is available to Tony's estate. So the nil rate band applicable on Tony's death is increased by 90%, from £325,000 to £617,500.

As Tony's estate is worth less than the increased nil rate band amount, there will be no inheritance tax to pay on his death. Contrast this with the position under the old rules, whereby Pat's unused nil rate band would have been wasted and Tony's estate would have suffered inheritance tax at 40% to the extent that it exceeded the nil rate band - a tax charge of £90,000.

Previously, many clients achieved an inheritance tax saving by including tax-efficient 'nil rate band discretionary trusts' in their wills. These recent changes to the inheritance tax regime will not automatically revoke or invalidate wills which contain nil rate band discretionary trusts. However, it would be wise for clients who have made wills of this type to review them now.

This is abbreviated version of our full briefing note on the Pre Budget Report. If you would like to receive a copy of our detailed briefing, please contact the Private Client team.

Even if your will is not affected by the Pre Budget Report, it is still sensible to review it on a regular basis, to make sure that it is still in accordance with your wishes. To book an appointment for a will review, please contact the Private Client team on 0114 266 6660.

Tags

Archive

April 20242March 20247February 20242January 20248December 20236November 20232October 20235September 20232August 20234July 20232June 20235May 20238March 20234February 20235January 20233December 20225November 20224October 20224September 20223August 20221June 20221May 20227April 20223March 20223February 20223January 20224December 20214November 20213October 20215September 20216August 20212July 202111June 20218May 20216April 20212March 20218February 20218January 20219December 20208November 202013October 20209September 20208August 20203July 20208June 202016May 202013April 20209March 202016February 20209January 202011December 20199November 20199October 201911September 20195August 20194July 20196May 20198April 20196March 20193February 20195January 20194December 20186November 20185October 20182September 20185August 20184July 20189June 20184May 201810April 20185March 20184February 20184January 20183December 20175November 20178October 20177September 20179August 20175July 20176June 201710May 20176April 20178March 201711February 20176January 201712December 20169November 20167October 201610September 201610August 20166July 20167June 20163May 20162April 20166March 20162February 20164January 20165December 20153November 20155October 20156September 20156August 20157July 20157June 20157May 20156April 20159March 20156February 201510January 20156December 20145November 20144October 20142September 20143May 20144March 20146February 20144January 20142December 20132November 20133September 20134July 20132June 20132May 20133April 20131March 20133February 20133January 20136December 20121November 20123October 20122August 20122July 20128June 20123April 20123March 20121January 20124December 20112November 20111October 20112September 20113August 20113July 20117June 20119May 20117April 20115March 20119February 20118January 20111December 20101October 20102September 20102August 20103July 20106June 20101May 20102April 20106March 20102February 20103January 20102December 20095November 20092October 20092September 20092August 20091July 20095June 20095May 20093April 20093March 20093February 20091January 20092November 20082October 20082September 20081August 20083July 20081January 20082

Featured Articles

Contact us