Coronavirus & disputes between directors and shareholders

Michael Doherty Michael Doherty 29 June 2020

For some private companies, the coronavirus disruption and the management of a business going forward will lead to disputes between directors and shareholders.

The pressures on those businesses returning, and restarting their operations in a different world, may result in some shareholders feeling that Directors have breached their duties to the company.

Mike Doherty, associate in Wake Smith’s litigation and dispute resolution team, specialises in these types of disputes and can provide advice on the options available.

Mike said: “COVID-19 has caused and will continue to cause, numerous problems for businesses, which may lead to disputes between shareholders and directors.

“As a shareholder, you should carefully review your rights. If you cannot resolve a dispute through open discussion then the Shareholders' Agreement should be the first stop, followed by the company’s Articles of Association.

“Both these are essential to control and protect your interest in a limited company and regulate disagreements.”

A Shareholders' Agreement is designed to protect a shareholder’s investment in a company, to establish a fair and equitable relationship amongst the shareholders and to help govern how the company is run. It is generally considered the best way for shareholders to protect their interests in a limited company.

It helps regulate disagreements amongst shareholders and will help to avoid the need to seek redress from the courts.

They can be bespoke to the collective or individual needs of the shareholders, and can also set out specifically how disputes should be resolved. This is especially important where there is an equal or even shareholding in a company where decisions cannot be easily passed without a majority.

Mike said: “Common methods of dispute resolution in Shareholders' Agreements are below and which option is appropriate for your company may be down to time, cost and the financial position of the different parties.”

Shareholder Agreements’ dispute resolution actions:

  • The Chairman of the board of directors has a casting vote.
  • Referral to a third party expert or mediator.
  • Put and call options - the holder of the option may require other shareholders to buy or sell their entire shareholding at a price consistent to a pre-determined formula.
  • Russian roulette - one shareholder offers the other shareholder a simple choice to either buy all of the shares off them, at the price proposed, or sell all of their shares to them at the same price.
  • Texas shoot-out – disputing shareholders provide sealed bids to buy out the other party's shares. The shareholder with the highest bid buys out the other shareholder.

If no Shareholders' Agreement is in place, parties can look to the company's Articles of Association, or Articles.

Mike added: “These are a company's rulebook and set out how the company's workings are governed. Every company is required by law to have a set of articles in place.

“They contain provisions relevant in a shareholder or director dispute such as whether shareholders can remove or appoint new directors and the transferring of shares; and detail the specific requirement needed to pass these resolutions.

“It is also important for companies to ensure that Shareholder Agreements and related Articles of Association do not contain contradictory terms.”

The final option, and often last straw, to a discontented shareholder is an Unfair Prejudice Petition. Here, an application to the court for relief is made where a shareholder believes the company’s affairs are being conducted in an unfair and prejudicial manner to their interests, including financial.

Mike added: “An Unfair Prejudice Petition is usually a remedy for minority oppression, especially within smaller companies such as unlisted, small and medium sized enterprises.

“Unfair Prejudice Petitions are personal actions; they are brought by one shareholder against another (or others). It is important, therefore, that the company itself remains neutral in these disputes.”

If the court finds that unfair prejudice has taken place, it can:

  • order a respondent shareholder to purchase the shares of the applicant shareholder;

or, if deemed more appropriate,

  • also allow the applicant shareholder to buy the respondent shareholder’s shares at a set price.

For further information on Shareholder/Director disputes and Unfair Prejudice Petitions please contact Mike Doherty at [email protected]

Tags

Archive

March 20247February 20242January 20248December 20236November 20232October 20235September 20232August 20234July 20232June 20235May 20238March 20234February 20235January 20233December 20225November 20224October 20224September 20223August 20221June 20221May 20227April 20223March 20223February 20223January 20224December 20214November 20213October 20215September 20216August 20212July 202111June 20218May 20216April 20212March 20218February 20218January 20219December 20208November 202013October 20209September 20208August 20203July 20208June 202016May 202013April 20209March 202016February 20209January 202011December 20199November 20199October 201911September 20195August 20194July 20196May 20198April 20196March 20193February 20195January 20194December 20186November 20185October 20182September 20185August 20184July 20189June 20184May 201810April 20185March 20184February 20184January 20183December 20175November 20178October 20177September 20179August 20175July 20176June 201710May 20176April 20178March 201711February 20176January 201712December 20169November 20167October 201610September 201610August 20166July 20167June 20163May 20162April 20166March 20162February 20164January 20165December 20153November 20155October 20156September 20156August 20157July 20157June 20157May 20156April 20159March 20156February 201510January 20156December 20145November 20144October 20142September 20143May 20144March 20146February 20144January 20142December 20132November 20133September 20134July 20132June 20132May 20133April 20131March 20133February 20133January 20136December 20121November 20123October 20122August 20122July 20128June 20123April 20123March 20121January 20124December 20112November 20111October 20112September 20113August 20113July 20117June 20119May 20117April 20115March 20119February 20118January 20111December 20101October 20102September 20102August 20103July 20106June 20101May 20102April 20106March 20102February 20103January 20102December 20095November 20092October 20092September 20092August 20091July 20095June 20095May 20093April 20093March 20093February 20091January 20092November 20082October 20082September 20081August 20083July 20081January 20082

Featured Articles

Contact us