When absence management becomes a swine

Wake Smith Solicitors 01 September 2009

Will swine flu make a dramatic return this autumn? Reports that the bug could come back more potently during the autumn and winter have spawned sensational headlines claiming it could be the beginning of the end for many businesses.

Mark Serby, employment solicitor at Wake Smith & Tofields, has looked behind the media hype to advise employers on what they should consider to protect themselves and their employees.

He says: "Suggestions that swine flu could cost UK business £8.6 billion through staff absence may be based on some accurate statistics, but absence management company FirstCare*has found that employees infected with the swine flu virus take an average of 4.3 days off work but that these reports are at best estimates.

e big numbers suggested are merely projections but have seemingly attracted enough attention to fuel wide spread panic amongst employers across the region.

"There will undoubtedly be a cost to businesses through staff absence particularly with employees who are required to care for ill relatives or children. There is a right for those employees with caring responsibilities for dependents to take necessary unpaid time off, in certain 'necessary' circumstances.

This right will extend to circumstances where, for example, a school is closed or other unexpected disruption. However, this is only in situations where time off is 'necessary', taking into account the circumstances of the individual employee but only a reasonable amount of time necessary to deal with the immediate crisis.

He went on: "Other suggestions that businesses might be liable for tens of thousands of pounds if their employees contract the virus at work are unlikely to survive legal scrutiny. As with any claims of such nature, there will be a burden on the employee to prove the virus was contracted at work and that the company failed in its duty to take reasonable steps to protect the health and welfare of its employees.

"Most employers have already adopted a sensible and pragmatic approach to employees who are suffering from symptoms related to swine flu.

Kevin suggests a number of 'measured and proportionate' steps employers can take to protect themselves and their employees

  • Consider an action plan to deal with the effects of any emergency, whether it be a pandemic or something altogether different. It may be that the company has key employees whose absence may cause immediate administrative or functional difficulties. In such circumstances, consider how their absence may be covered in the short and medium term by other employees.

  • Alternatively, consider the possibility of home working and remote access to the office systems, files and support. Technology is readily available to facilitate remote working which will cut down the risk of further infection across the firm. Bear in mind health and safety requirements related to home working, where workstation assessments are likely to be necessary.

  • Of course, a company should not force an employee to work if he or she is unfit to do so. If the flu is contracted it can affect different people in different ways. Where an employee does not exhibit flu like symptoms, but is caring for a relative, it may be that they are happy to work from home.

  • Be aware that the Government is considering the period of self-certified absence from work from 7 days to 14 days where swine flu is suspected. Any company policies should be relaxed in accordance with the Government's guidance.

  • It may also be worth thinking about pulling together a database of former or previously-retired staff who could be contacted at short notice to assist on a temporary basis.

  • Make it clear to employees that they have an obligation to care for themselves, their colleagues and a responsibility to the company. Regular hand washing, antibacterial hand gel, information posters and regular emails or other communications providing advice to employees will all help avoid unnecessary absence and limit any risks to the company.

  • Don't actively encourage an employee to return to work who is not fit to do so. According to official guidance, following the development of flu-like symptoms people should stay at home for seven days during the incubation period. Forcing employees to attend work where it may be a risk to their own health and safety or that of others may result in a claim of constructive dismissal. Alternatively, sending perfectly fit employees home just to be on the safe side may amount to a breach of contract.

  • Don't panic! With careful assessment, contingency planning and a sensible approach, there is no reason why swine flu should have any more than a minimal impact on your business.

Mark adds: "These suggestions are not guaranteed to prevent the predicted effects of swine flu on your business, but they might just help. After all, in both a medical and a legal sense: prevention is better than cure."

For more information and advice on the legal issues surrounding swine flu please contact the Employment team at Wake Smith on 0114 266 6660 or email [email protected].

*Quote from Human Resources online news centre at http://www.hrmagazine.co.uk/

Tags

Archive

April 20241March 20247February 20242January 20248December 20236November 20232October 20235September 20232August 20234July 20232June 20235May 20238March 20234February 20235January 20233December 20225November 20224October 20224September 20223August 20221June 20221May 20227April 20223March 20223February 20223January 20224December 20214November 20213October 20215September 20216August 20212July 202111June 20218May 20216April 20212March 20218February 20218January 20219December 20208November 202013October 20209September 20208August 20203July 20208June 202016May 202013April 20209March 202016February 20209January 202011December 20199November 20199October 201911September 20195August 20194July 20196May 20198April 20196March 20193February 20195January 20194December 20186November 20185October 20182September 20185August 20184July 20189June 20184May 201810April 20185March 20184February 20184January 20183December 20175November 20178October 20177September 20179August 20175July 20176June 201710May 20176April 20178March 201711February 20176January 201712December 20169November 20167October 201610September 201610August 20166July 20167June 20163May 20162April 20166March 20162February 20164January 20165December 20153November 20155October 20156September 20156August 20157July 20157June 20157May 20156April 20159March 20156February 201510January 20156December 20145November 20144October 20142September 20143May 20144March 20146February 20144January 20142December 20132November 20133September 20134July 20132June 20132May 20133April 20131March 20133February 20133January 20136December 20121November 20123October 20122August 20122July 20128June 20123April 20123March 20121January 20124December 20112November 20111October 20112September 20113August 20113July 20117June 20119May 20117April 20115March 20119February 20118January 20111December 20101October 20102September 20102August 20103July 20106June 20101May 20102April 20106March 20102February 20103January 20102December 20095November 20092October 20092September 20092August 20091July 20095June 20095May 20093April 20093March 20093February 20091January 20092November 20082October 20082September 20081August 20083July 20081January 20082

Featured Articles

Contact us