Whistleblowing

Wake Smith Solicitors 27 March 2014

The case of Abertawe Bro Morgannwg University Health Board v Dr M Ferguson concerned a GP whistleblower who made claims that her Health Board failed to protect her from detriment following Dr Ferguson reporting her concerns over a fellow GP's prescribing. The Health Board sought to strike out some of Dr Ferguson's allegations that she had been subject to detriment. The employment Tribunal refused and the Health Board appealed against this decision to the Employment Appeal Tribunal. The Employment Appeal Tribunal again refused to strike out the allegations and noted that in cases which are likely to be very fact-sensitive such as those involving discrimination or public interest disclosures the circumstances in which it will be possible to strike out are likely to be rare. This now paves the way for Dr Ferguson to continue her substantive claim that the Health Board failed to protect her from reprisals after she raised concerns about her partner's prescribing. Dr Ferguson was a GP Partner in Wales. All GP practices are required to enter into a contract with the relevant health board.   Dr Ferguson disclosed concerns that a partner in her practice had acted wrongly in prescribing Fentanyl. It was accepted that the disclosure was made in good faith and there were reasonable grounds for it but the Health Board did not necessarily accept the truth of the disclosures made. Dr Ferguson claimed that because she had made disclosures her GP Partners had acted to cause her detriment but also that the Health Board had acted both positively to subject her to a detriment and also negatively had failed to act. She claimed to be entitled to a remedy under the whistle blowing provisions of the Employment Rights Act 1996. Dr Ferguson claimed that:-

  1. The Health Board had failed properly to investigate her concern preventing her from fulfilling her GMC obligations;
  2. The Health Board failed to treat Dr Ferguson's identity as whistle-blower with due confidentiality releasing her name and her report to her GP Partners;
  • The Board had failed to act in accordance with its own whistle-blowing policy so as to prevent Dr Ferguson from being subject to reprisals from her GP colleagues;
  1. The Health Board had forced Dr Ferguson to take voluntary leave as an alternative to suspension and had inappropriately maintained that enforced voluntary leave;
  1. The Health Board had forced Dr Ferguson to be subjected to an investigation by Paul Myers.

If Dr Ferguson wins her claim the ramifications could be huge. Counsel for the Health Board were concerned that the case was screened as an attempt to saddle the Health Board with the full financial consequences of Dr Ferguson's loss of income as a GP. The EAT made the point that if substantiated the consequence was not likely to be that Dr Ferguson would be entitled to compensation as if she would never work again. The EAT stated that it will be for the Tribunal to determine in due course and in accordance with evidence whether compensation would be payable. If successful in her claim it opens the door to GPs bringing claims against Health Boards (and presumably their now successors) that they failed to protect against the consequences of whistle blowing and Health Boards will need to ensure that they investigate whistle blowing complaints properly and prevent GPs from suffering from reprisals.

Tags

Archive

April 20241March 20247February 20242January 20248December 20236November 20232October 20235September 20232August 20234July 20232June 20235May 20238March 20234February 20235January 20233December 20225November 20224October 20224September 20223August 20221June 20221May 20227April 20223March 20223February 20223January 20224December 20214November 20213October 20215September 20216August 20212July 202111June 20218May 20216April 20212March 20218February 20218January 20219December 20208November 202013October 20209September 20208August 20203July 20208June 202016May 202013April 20209March 202016February 20209January 202011December 20199November 20199October 201911September 20195August 20194July 20196May 20198April 20196March 20193February 20195January 20194December 20186November 20185October 20182September 20185August 20184July 20189June 20184May 201810April 20185March 20184February 20184January 20183December 20175November 20178October 20177September 20179August 20175July 20176June 201710May 20176April 20178March 201711February 20176January 201712December 20169November 20167October 201610September 201610August 20166July 20167June 20163May 20162April 20166March 20162February 20164January 20165December 20153November 20155October 20156September 20156August 20157July 20157June 20157May 20156April 20159March 20156February 201510January 20156December 20145November 20144October 20142September 20143May 20144March 20146February 20144January 20142December 20132November 20133September 20134July 20132June 20132May 20133April 20131March 20133February 20133January 20136December 20121November 20123October 20122August 20122July 20128June 20123April 20123March 20121January 20124December 20112November 20111October 20112September 20113August 20113July 20117June 20119May 20117April 20115March 20119February 20118January 20111December 20101October 20102September 20102August 20103July 20106June 20101May 20102April 20106March 20102February 20103January 20102December 20095November 20092October 20092September 20092August 20091July 20095June 20095May 20093April 20093March 20093February 20091January 20092November 20082October 20082September 20081August 20083July 20081January 20082

Featured Articles

Contact us