Can You Pursue A Claim For Suffering A Fall Due To Snow?

Wake Smith Solicitors 28 January 2015

Hospitals have noted an increase in the number of injuries to patients from falls due to the snow and ice. Typically, hospitals are seeing more and more attendances for injuries such as simple strains and minor fractures of the ankle, elbow, forearm and shoulder.

This raises some interesting questions. What if you have suffered an injury yourself in a road traffic accident or in a fall due to the snow and ice - can you bring a claim against the local authority? Can somebody bring a claim against you if they fall on the snow and ice in front of your home after you have cleared your pathway? Can you pursue a claim for suffering a fall due to snow and ice whilst on a public highway or someone else's premises? Responsibilities of the Local Authority It is said that under the Highways Act 1980 the local authority is responsible for ensuring 'safe passage' along a highway so far as is reasonably practicable. The definition of highways includes adopted roads and public footpaths. Section 58 of the Highways Act 1980 gives local authorities a defence against many claims where snow and ice are involved. This defence to such claims states that they only have to clear the highways where it is reasonably practicable to do so. In this day and age local Authorities often have limited financial resources and so there is no requirement to keep all routes clear, all the time. This makes it difficult to pursue such claims. Responsibilities of an occupier What if you are in your own home or visiting someone else's home or premises? What responsibilities do occupiers have? Could you or they be held liable for an accident that occurs? Private homeowners or occupiers of houses do not have an obligation to clear snow or ice from a public highway. However, if you do clear the snow and ice and then someone is injured as a result, could you be held responsible? Potentially, yes you can. If you clear the snow away but do so inadequately or less satisfactorily than you should which then leaves ice (which is often worse than the snow) then you may be liable to passers by who fall and injure themselves. This is because you owe a common law duty of care to others (also called the law of negligence). You should not do anything that makes an area unsafe for others. It is the responsibility of an occupier to take 'reasonable care' to ensure that any visitor is safe. If you run a business where you expect to receive customers then the same principle applies. You must ensure that entrances and exits from your premises are maintained in a condition that is safe and as far as possible, without risk to the visitor. So the issue is not just whether you have attempted to clear the snow or not. As an occupier you can be held responsible for injuries caused by 'failing to act reasonably' in order to prevent accidents. The moral of this is if you decide that clearing snow away is the best way to keep yourself and others safe, then do it extremely thoroughly! Of course, anyone wanting to pursue a claim for an accident in the snow must still prove their claim on what is called the balance of probabilities. That is to say that it must be more likely than not that negligence was likely to have caused the accident. As a claimant you should try to collect persuasive, compelling evidence of the state of the area where the accident took place - such as photographs and also obtain supportive witness evidence or you may find that your claim is less likely to succeed. For further information about pursuing a claim for personal injury, please contact David Brown or Kevin Bostock at [email protected] or [email protected] or by telephone on 0114 2666660.

Tags

Archive

April 20241March 20247February 20242January 20248December 20236November 20232October 20235September 20232August 20234July 20232June 20235May 20238March 20234February 20235January 20233December 20225November 20224October 20224September 20223August 20221June 20221May 20227April 20223March 20223February 20223January 20224December 20214November 20213October 20215September 20216August 20212July 202111June 20218May 20216April 20212March 20218February 20218January 20219December 20208November 202013October 20209September 20208August 20203July 20208June 202016May 202013April 20209March 202016February 20209January 202011December 20199November 20199October 201911September 20195August 20194July 20196May 20198April 20196March 20193February 20195January 20194December 20186November 20185October 20182September 20185August 20184July 20189June 20184May 201810April 20185March 20184February 20184January 20183December 20175November 20178October 20177September 20179August 20175July 20176June 201710May 20176April 20178March 201711February 20176January 201712December 20169November 20167October 201610September 201610August 20166July 20167June 20163May 20162April 20166March 20162February 20164January 20165December 20153November 20155October 20156September 20156August 20157July 20157June 20157May 20156April 20159March 20156February 201510January 20156December 20145November 20144October 20142September 20143May 20144March 20146February 20144January 20142December 20132November 20133September 20134July 20132June 20132May 20133April 20131March 20133February 20133January 20136December 20121November 20123October 20122August 20122July 20128June 20123April 20123March 20121January 20124December 20112November 20111October 20112September 20113August 20113July 20117June 20119May 20117April 20115March 20119February 20118January 20111December 20101October 20102September 20102August 20103July 20106June 20101May 20102April 20106March 20102February 20103January 20102December 20095November 20092October 20092September 20092August 20091July 20095June 20095May 20093April 20093March 20093February 20091January 20092November 20082October 20082September 20081August 20083July 20081January 20082

Featured Articles

Contact us