Pre-Nuptial Agreements not just for the top 1%

Wake Smith Solicitors 18 January 2016

The way society views marriage is changing, the marriage rate has been in slow decline, couples are marrying later and are more concerned about what might happen if they divorce. The latest figures suggest that 42% of all marriages end in divorce. This may be the reason for the increase in instructions for solicitors to prepared pre-nuptial agreements. Let's face it, pre-nuptial agreements are unromantic, when one goes down on one knee asking that special person to spend their lives together, it's rarely followed by a BUT! But, how do you protect pre-marital assets? What about those family gifts of a house deposit from the bank of mum and dad? Protecting inheritance for children from a previous marriage? Hard earned investments or the family business that is intended to be passed down the family from generation to generation, which you wish to protect from being sold off as part of the marital settlement. How can you protect your past achievements or family wealth, from a possible future breakdown of your marriage. Long gone are the presumptions of a life-long marriage, it is something we all aspire to, but the statistics weigh heavily against our favour. I know how hard it is for clients to start the discussion with their partner about protecting their assets. The concern is too fold, how do I support and protect what I have? How can I achieve this without damaging the relationship I have with the person I want to marry? However, surely honesty and integrity are the foundations of any marriage? We should not forget that marriage is a contract, for better for worse, for richer, for poorer, those vows are centuries old, for some they follow true, a life-long happy marriage, while for others, regret of if only they had considered what might be the outcome. If honesty should be the founding principle when entering into a new marriage, then being honest from outset, defining our expectations if it all should end, should be as equally as open and honest. Legal status of pre-nuptial agreements The law in relation to pre-nuptial agreements has developed following the Supreme Court Ruling in the case of Radmacher v Granatino 2010. Following the court decision in this case the Law Commission published a report entitled Matrimonial Property, Needs and Agreements  putting forward legislative reform, while this has not yet been finalised some of the proposals of the reforms may become law in due course, setting out the criteria for what will be known as a "Qualifying Nuptial Agreement". The agreements must meet the following:

  1. The agreement must be contractually valid, in that there should be no doubt that the parties entering into the agreement are doing so of their free will.
  2. It must be validly executed as a deed and contain a statement signed by both parties.
  3. It must not have been made within the 28 days before the wedding.
  4. Both parties to the agreement must have received disclosure of the other party's financial situation when entering into the agreement.
  5. Both parties must have received legal advice at the time they entered into the agreement.
  6. If the agreement fails to make sufficient financial provision for children, it will be set aside by the court.
  7. Both parties' needs must be met, by the settlement terms of the agreement. The possibility of ongoing financial provision for a party caring for children is important. An agreement that results in a party receiving nothing or very little would not be upheld by the court.

The law in respect of pre-nuptial agreements is by no way certain, but there are clear advantages to entering to the agreement. It allows for clarity, allowing you to agree at the outset what would happen in the event of your separation. There is transparency right from the beginning both parties know the others financial positions before entering into the marriage. In the long run, entering into the agreement could save you legal costs escalating should you divorce later down the line. You are able to ring fence pre-marital assets thereby offering as much protection as the court will allow to those assets you brought into the marriage. If the other party has significant debts, these can be isolated at the start, meaning it would be easier to protect your assets from being used to satisfy those debts later on. Although the thought of an agreement is unromantic, entering into an agreement that is fair, sometimes lengthy and laborious, can look to those life changing events, the birth of a child, the loss of physical or mental capacity, and still offer the protection needed. Pre-Nuptial Agreements may not be entirely binding, but they do go some significant way towards persuading the court about the parties' intentions when entering into the marriage. It is always better to consider with the benefit of forethought instead of hindsight. If you would like any further information of advice about entering into a Pre-Nuptial Agreement, then please do not hesitate to contact our family team on 0114 266 6660, who are more than happy to arrange a no obligation appointment with one of our expert family solicitors. Author: Alison Gaddes - Solicitor with Wake Smith Solicitors Limited Contact Alison at [email protected]

Tags

Archive

April 20241March 20247February 20242January 20248December 20236November 20232October 20235September 20232August 20234July 20232June 20235May 20238March 20234February 20235January 20233December 20225November 20224October 20224September 20223August 20221June 20221May 20227April 20223March 20223February 20223January 20224December 20214November 20213October 20215September 20216August 20212July 202111June 20218May 20216April 20212March 20218February 20218January 20219December 20208November 202013October 20209September 20208August 20203July 20208June 202016May 202013April 20209March 202016February 20209January 202011December 20199November 20199October 201911September 20195August 20194July 20196May 20198April 20196March 20193February 20195January 20194December 20186November 20185October 20182September 20185August 20184July 20189June 20184May 201810April 20185March 20184February 20184January 20183December 20175November 20178October 20177September 20179August 20175July 20176June 201710May 20176April 20178March 201711February 20176January 201712December 20169November 20167October 201610September 201610August 20166July 20167June 20163May 20162April 20166March 20162February 20164January 20165December 20153November 20155October 20156September 20156August 20157July 20157June 20157May 20156April 20159March 20156February 201510January 20156December 20145November 20144October 20142September 20143May 20144March 20146February 20144January 20142December 20132November 20133September 20134July 20132June 20132May 20133April 20131March 20133February 20133January 20136December 20121November 20123October 20122August 20122July 20128June 20123April 20123March 20121January 20124December 20112November 20111October 20112September 20113August 20113July 20117June 20119May 20117April 20115March 20119February 20118January 20111December 20101October 20102September 20102August 20103July 20106June 20101May 20102April 20106March 20102February 20103January 20102December 20095November 20092October 20092September 20092August 20091July 20095June 20095May 20093April 20093March 20093February 20091January 20092November 20082October 20082September 20081August 20083July 20081January 20082

Featured Articles

Contact us