Landmark case provides some welcome reassurance to executors stuck in assets ownership disputes

Wake Smith Solicitors 05 June 2026

The High Court has awarded properties estimated to be worth up to £5 million to the wife of a deceased London property investor and restaurateur after declarations of trust signed before his death were found to have no legal or equitable effect.

The judgment regarding the case of Teixeira v Moaven and Ors is particularly important for contentious probate practitioners and professional independent administrators appointed into highly contested estates.

John Breeze, Director and Head of Wills, Trust and Inheritance Disputes at Wake Smith Solicitors looks at the landmark case, which provides some welcome reassurance to executors who may find themselves stuck in the middle of family disputes about the ownership of estate assets.

John said: “The general rule for executors is they must remain neutral in their dealings, or else risk being punished in costs.

“It is therefore understandable that executors, when faced with conflicting demands from estate beneficiaries, may feel the need to err on the side of caution.”

In this case, there were two professional executors, a solicitor and an accountant, appointed to act jointly with a family member of the deceased.

The executors took the view that several properties in dispute should form part of the deceased’s estate, and took an active role in litigation to contest the validity of “sham” Declarations of Trust which appeared to place the properties outside of the estate.  The action was successful and the properties were recovered for the estate.

John added: “At trial the opposing party tried to argue that the executors should not be allowed to take an active role, due to their duty of neutrality, but the Court disagreed.

“Instead, the Judge held that: “the personal representatives' fundamental duty was to get in and protect the estate” and “if, as here, the personal representatives took the view that the proper protection of the estate required them to take an active stance, then, they were perfectly entitled to take that position”

“The Court’s decision is helpful, especially for professional executors who are often appointed by their client Wills, or by the Court, to ensure that everything is dealt with fearlessly and correctly.  Being neutral should not equate to being passive and allowing the estate to suffer loss or delay.

“But the Court’s decision is not a free pass to executors to side with one set of beneficiaries over another.  It was said in cases where beneficiaries are already taking action to resolve the issue “it would be appropriate for the personal representatives to, simply, stand by and await the outcome.” In that context, the judge added “an unnecessary intervention could sound in costs.”

Wake Smith Solicitors are specialists in the administration of estates and in contentious probate, and are regularly appointed as executors of client Wills and, by the Court, to act as independent administrators of complex and contested estates.

When appropriate, Wake Smith can, and will, take action through the Courts to resolve issues that cannot be settled by agreement.

If you have a dispute or concerns about the administration of an estate, contact John Breeze directly at [email protected], or call us on 0114 266 6660. Alternatively, you can submit an online contact form here. 

For all contentious probate services click here

Tags

Archive

June 20262May 20269April 20263March 20266February 20266January 20266December 20257November 20257October 20257September 20258August 20251July 20255June 20256May 20258April 20255March 20253February 20256January 20255December 20245November 20244October 20246September 20245August 20245July 20243June 20243May 20245April 20242March 20246February 20242January 20247December 20236November 20232October 20233September 20232August 20234July 20232June 20235May 20237March 20234February 20235January 20233December 20224November 20224October 20223September 20222June 20221May 20224April 20223March 20222February 20223January 20223December 20213November 20213October 20213September 20213August 20212July 20219June 20217May 20216April 20212March 20216February 20216January 20218December 20206November 202010October 20207September 20206August 20203July 20207June 202012May 202011April 20206March 202013February 20207January 20205December 20199November 20199October 201911September 20195August 20194July 20196May 20198April 20196March 20193February 20195January 20194December 20186November 20185October 20182September 20185August 20184July 20189June 20184May 201810April 20185March 20184February 20184January 20183December 20175November 20178October 20177September 20179August 20175July 20176June 201710May 20175April 20178March 201711February 20176January 201710December 20169November 20167October 201610September 201610August 20166July 20167June 20163May 20162April 20166March 20162February 20164January 20165December 20153November 20155October 20156September 20156August 20157July 20157June 20157May 20156April 20159March 20156February 201510January 20156December 20145November 20144October 20142September 20143May 20144March 20146February 20144January 20142December 20132November 20133September 20134July 20132June 20132May 20133April 20131March 20133February 20133January 20136December 20121November 20123October 20122August 20122July 20128June 20123April 20123March 20121January 20124December 20112November 20111October 20112September 20113August 20113July 20117June 20119May 20117April 20115March 20119February 20118January 20111December 20101October 20102September 20102August 20103July 20106June 20101May 20102April 20106March 20102February 20103January 20102December 20095November 20092October 20092September 20092August 20091July 20095June 20095May 20093April 20093March 20093February 20091January 20092November 20082October 20082September 20081August 20083July 20081January 20082
Contact us