Non-compete clauses: What employers should be thinking about now

Liam Kenealy Liam Kenealy 10 November 2026

The Government confirmed plans to restrict non-compete clauses in the October 2026 Budget, with a detailed policy position expected in early 2027. The scope and timing of reform remain unconfirmed.

The announcements do not change the law. For employers, the priority is to review existing restrictions and wider contractual protections, not automatically remove non-compete clauses.

Liam Kenealy, Director and Head of Employment and HR Services at Wake Smith Solicitors looks at the subject.

Why are non-compete clauses under review?

Non-compete clauses are designed to restrict the employee in respect of competing business actions for a period after their employment ends.

While they can help businesses protect confidential information, customer connections, goodwill and investment in training, the Government has expressed concern that these clauses can be overly restrictive and may reduce job mobility, limit access to skilled labour and hinder innovation.

The current position remains that a non-compete clause will only be enforceable if the employer can show it protects a legitimate business interest and goes no further than is reasonably necessary. A clause that is too broad, too long or unsupported by a clear business interest will likely be unenforceable, but this assessment will depend on the wording of the clause and the circumstances at the time it was entered into.

What reform options are being considered?

The Government’s paper outlined a range of possible reforms which included:

  • a statutory limit on the length of non-compete clauses – either by way of a proposed general limit of 3 months or by applying different limits based on the size of the business (with the time limits for businesses with fewer employees being longer);
  • a complete ban;
  • a ban below a salary threshold; or
  • a combined ban below a salary threshold and a statutory limit of 3 months - under which non-compete clauses would be prohibited for lower-paid workers and capped for higher earners.

What does this mean for employers?

For now, you do not need to remove non-compete clauses from your contracts simply because reform is being considered. However, before any changes come into force, you should check whether your existing restrictions are targeted, proportionate and supported by clear commercial reasons. You should also be cautious about using standard wording across all employees without considering seniority, access to confidential information, customer influence and the actual risk posed by the individual role.

Practical steps employers can take now

You should consider taking the following steps:

  • Review existing contracts, particularly for senior employees and those with access to confidential information, strategic plans or key customer relationships.
  • Check whether each non-compete clause is reasonable in duration, geographical scope and business scope.
  • Identify the legitimate business interest each restriction is intended to protect.
  • Consider whether a shorter or narrower restriction would provide sufficient protection.
  • Review notice periods and garden leave clauses as part of the overall exit strategy.
  • Strengthen alternative protections, including confidentiality, non-solicitation, non-dealing and non-poaching provisions.
  • Ensure customer relationships and key knowledge are not concentrated in one individual wherever possible.
  • Put processes in place to respond quickly when key employees resign, including mapping customer contacts and reallocating relationships during notice or garden leave.

While reform is likely to take time, you should not wait until legislation is introduced before reviewing your position.

The main takeaway is that non-compete clauses should not be treated as a default protection. They should be used selectively, drafted carefully and supported by a broader strategy for protecting confidential information, customer relationships and workforce stability.

For advice on employment matters contact Wake Smith’s employment law team here or on 0114 266 6660.

Does your company need regular legal advice on HR matters? Find out more about our Employment Law Retainer package here.

To sign up to our mailing list to receive Employment Law updates and invites to future events or webinars,click here.

For further details about Wake Smith’s employment law services, click here.

Tags

Archive

November 20264October 20267September 20268August 20266July 20264June 20267May 20269April 20263March 20266February 20266January 20266December 20257November 20257October 20257September 20258August 20251July 20255June 20256May 20258April 20255March 20253February 20256January 20255December 20245November 20244October 20246September 20245August 20245July 20243June 20243May 20245April 20242March 20246February 20242January 20247December 20236November 20232October 20233September 20232August 20234July 20232June 20235May 20237March 20234February 20235January 20233December 20224November 20224October 20223September 20222June 20221May 20224April 20223March 20222February 20223January 20223December 20213November 20213October 20213September 20213August 20212July 20219June 20217May 20216April 20212March 20216February 20216January 20218December 20206November 202010October 20207September 20206August 20203July 20207June 202012May 202011April 20206March 202013February 20207January 20205December 20199November 20199October 201911September 20195August 20194July 20196May 20198April 20196March 20193February 20195January 20194December 20186November 20185October 20182September 20185August 20184July 20189June 20184May 201810April 20185March 20184February 20184January 20183December 20175November 20178October 20177September 20179August 20175July 20176June 201710May 20175April 20178March 201711February 20176January 201710December 20169November 20167October 201610September 201610August 20166July 20167June 20163May 20162April 20166March 20162February 20164January 20165December 20153November 20155October 20156September 20156August 20157July 20157June 20157May 20156April 20159March 20156February 201510January 20156December 20145November 20144October 20142September 20143May 20144March 20146February 20144January 20142December 20132November 20133September 20134July 20132June 20132May 20133April 20131March 20133February 20133January 20136December 20121November 20123October 20122August 20122July 20128June 20123April 20123March 20121January 20124December 20112November 20111October 20112September 20113August 20113July 20117June 20119May 20117April 20115March 20119February 20118January 20111December 20101October 20102September 20102August 20103July 20106June 20101May 20102April 20106March 20102February 20103January 20102December 20095November 20092October 20092September 20092August 20091July 20095June 20095May 20093April 20093March 20093February 20091January 20092November 20082October 20082September 20081August 20083July 20081January 20082
Contact us